Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40507314›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Older Patients: An Overview of Published Data.

Marko Lens, Jacob Schachter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marko LensElla Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0009-0005-1058-1886
Jacob SchachterElla Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma has important burden in older populations due to high incidence and aggressive biology. The emergence of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) significantly improved melanoma prognosis. Currently, the body of knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of these treatments in geriatric patients is primarily based on the results outside of clinical trials since the majority of clinical studies do not include older patients. We present a comprehensive narrative review of published data regarding efficacy and safety of therapeutic modalities using immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients age 65-75 years and >75 years: the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor (ipilimumab), the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), and the lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) inhibitor (relatlimab). We carefully address difficulties in multi-disciplinary clinical decision-making in care of older melanoma patients. Although many older patients may not be offered immunotherapy, the available evidence indicates that immunotherapy is equally beneficial in the older patients and does not have higher incidence of adverse events in this group of patients compared to younger population.

Indexed as

geriatricimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapymelanomaoldersystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID40507314
PMCPMC12153560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.