ReviewCancers2025
T-Cell Engager Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Molecular Insights into a New Frontier in Immunotherapy.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ineffectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in prostate cancer: is it just a question of '-mabs'?The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Single injection of modified self-amplifying RNA encoding a CD19 bispecific T cell engager mediates long-term malignant B cell clearance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bispecific and multispecific immune engagers for redirecting innate and adaptive immunity against hematologic cancers.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- MDX-2001-101 study protocol: a phase I/IIa, multicenter, first-in-human, open-label clinical trial evaluating MDX2001 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- T-cell engagers in cancer immunotherapy: mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Inflammasome-associated pyroptosis and tumor angiogenesis in prostate cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Clinically oriented immune heterogeneity in prostate cancer: emerging targets and strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Advances in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Journey from Standard of Care to New Emerging Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Diverse PD-1, CD163, and FOXP3 Profiles in Primary and Metastatic Microenvironments of Prostate Cancer.Oncology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced prostate cancer (PCa) remains lethal despite standard therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors offer limited benefit in its "immune-cold" microenvironment. T-cell engagers (TCEs)-bispecific antibodies linking CD3 on T-cells to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs)-provide potent, MHC-independent cytotoxicity, overcoming a key resistance mechanism. While early PSMA-targeted TCEs established proof-of-concept, recent data, notably for six transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1)-targeting agents like Xaluritamig, demonstrate more substantial objective responses, highlighting progress through improved target selection and molecular design. This review synthesizes the evolving landscape of TCEs targeting PSMA, STEAP1, and DLL3 in PCa. We critically evaluate emerging clinical evidence, arguing that realizing the significant therapeutic potential of TCEs requires overcoming key challenges, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), limited response durability, and antigen escape. We contend that future success hinges on sophisticated engineering strategies (e.g., affinity tuning, masking, multispecific constructs) and rationally designed combination therapies tailored to disease-specific hurdles. Strategies for toxicity mitigation, the crucial role of biomarker-driven patient selection, and potential integration with existing treatments are also discussed. Accumulating evidence supports TCEs becoming a new therapeutic pillar for advanced PCa, but achieving this demands sustained innovation focused on optimizing efficacy and safety. This review critically connects molecular engineering advancements with clinical realities and future imperatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.