ReviewCancers2025
JAK Inhibitors and Risk of Cancer in IBD Patients.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biologics, Janus Kinase Inhibitors, and Cancer: The Comparator on Trial.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- Microbiota and immune-related adverse events in cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Dermatologic Toxicities Induced by JAK Inhibitors.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Prebiotic-Engineered Oral Nanoplatform against Ulcerative Colitis via Photodynamic Remodeling of Gut Microbiota and Macrophage Polarization.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Janus kinase inhibitors, including tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, have emerged as effective therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). By targeting the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, these agents modulate immune responses and reduce inflammation. However, concerns regarding the potential risk of malignancy associated with their use have gained significant attention. The JAK-STAT pathway is not only critical for inflammatory signaling but also plays a pivotal role in cellular growth, differentiation, and tumor surveillance. Observational studies and clinical trial data in rheumatoid arthritis have reported malignancies, including non-melanoma skin cancer and solid tumors, in patients receiving JAK inhibitors, with evidence suggesting variable risks depending on the selectivity of the agent. Current evidence does not suggest an increased risk of oncogenesis in patients with IBDs. Balancing therapeutic efficacy with long-term safety requires ongoing vigilance; patient stratification based on risk factors; and tailored monitoring strategies to mitigate potential adverse effects, including malignancies, during JAK inhibitor therapy. Long-term follow-up data of up to 10 years offer reassuring evidence that JAK inhibitor therapy in IBD patients does not confer an increased risk of malignancies, supporting their continued use within appropriate clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.