ReviewCancers2025
Electrochemotherapy in the Management of Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrochemotherapy Treatment for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKeratinocyte carcinomas, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), presents a growing concern. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), an emerging treatment modality, combines chemotherapy and electroporation to enhance drug delivery into cells. However, reviews evaluating ECT in keratinocyte carcinomas are lacking.
objectivesThis study reviews the efficacy and toxicity of ECT in the treatment and palliation of keratinocyte carcinomas.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, tumor response, long-term disease outcomes, and toxicity data were extracted. Quality of studies was assessed using validated tools. Primary endpoints included tumor response; secondary endpoints included long-term disease outcomes and toxicity.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included. Complete response (CR) rates ranged from 50 to 100% and from 10 to 100% for BCC and SCC, respectively. OS rates ranged from 95 (14 months) to 100 (1 year) % and from 64 (1 year) to 85.1 (8.6 months) % for BCC and SCC, respectively. One-year local disease-free survival (LDFS) rates were 89% and 87% for BCC and SCC, respectively. For BCC, local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates were 96% (1 year), 90% (2 year), and 70% (5 year). For SCC, 1-year LPFS rates were 80% on a per-patient basis and 49% on a per-lesion basis.
conclusionsECT is effective and tolerable in the treatment and palliation of keratinocyte carcinomas. Future studies should focus on improving reporting quality, optimizing treatment protocols, and investigating long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.