ArticleNutrients2025
Association Between Dietary Protein Sources and Nutrient Intake in the Diet of Canadian Children.
Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Examination of the Effect of Yogurt Consumption on Nutrient Quality of the Diets of Canadians Across the Ages.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Associations between leukocyte telomere length and three measures of folate status: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 1999-2002.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesCanada's 2019 Food Guide (CFG) encourages the increased consumption of plant-based foods as dietary protein sources. However, the nutritional implications of replacing animal-based proteins with plant-based alternatives in children's diets remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between protein food sources and nutrient intake in Canadian children aged 9-18 years.
methodsWe analyzed data from 2324 children from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), using the Public-Use Microdata File (PUMF) containing 24 h dietary recalls. Participants were categorized into four groups based on the proportion of protein from plant sources: Group 1 (0-24.9%), Group 2 (25-49.9%), Group 3 (50-74.9%), and Group 4 (75-100%). Nutrient intakes were compared and assessed against the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) and Adequate Intake (AI).
resultsGroups 1 and 3 had less favorable macronutrient profiles than Group 2. A 3:1 animal-to-plant protein ratio (Group 2) aligned most closely with dietary recommendations. Groups 1 and 2 exceeded RDAs for protein, iron, vitamin B12, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, and zinc by over 146% (about four SDs above the mean requirement), suggesting a low risk of inadequacy, although saturated fat intake was high. The intakes of vitamin D and folate were below 66% of the RDA, while calcium and magnesium were below 100% in some subgroups, with probabilities of inadequacy of 0.93 and 0.31, respectively. Group 4 (2.71%) was too small for reliable analysis.
conclusionsAn approximate 3:1 ratio of animal-to-plant protein sources may represent an optimal balance for supporting nutrient intake and improving macronutrient profiles in the diets of Canadian children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.