ArticleBiological research2025
Synergistic effect of honeybees and wild floral visitors in promoting sweet cherry fruit set in central Chile.
Article in Biological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent evidence highlights the key role of wild insects as pollinators in agroecosystems, enhancing fruit set in crops such as sweet cherry (Prunus avium). In Chile, the contribution of wild insects to crop yield remains poorly understood, and most farmers rely on managed Apis mellifera or Bombus terrestris for sweet cherry pollination. Here we evaluate the role of wild and managed floral visitors' taxa in fruit sets of sweet cherry cultivated in Mediterranean-type ecosystems of central Chile.
methodsThe contribution of (i) Apis mellifera, (ii) wild insects, and (iii) Bombus terrestris floral visitors were analyzed using a Linear Mixed Model with visitation rate of each group as a fixed factor and a fruit set as a response variable. Orchards were included as a random factor.
resultsWe recorded 24 species of floral visitors. Apis mellifera was the most frequent visitor, as the orchards supplemented pollination with beehives, followed by visits from wild insects and B. terrestris. Our results revealed that interaction between honeybees and wild insects significantly promoted higher fruit sets, while no effect of B. terrestris or A. mellifera visits alone was observed.
conclusionsWe argue that wild insects contribute to the sweet cherry fruit set in the Mediterranean-type ecosystems of Chile, complementing the pollination services provided by A. mellifera. Our study reinforces the evidence about the importance of promoting wild floral visitors' presence to enhance pollination and move toward more sustainable agriculture systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.