Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40506782›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025

Evidence of inequities experienced by the rare disease community with respect to receipt of a diagnosis and access to services: a scoping review of UK and international evidence.

Simon Briscoe, Clara Martin Pintado, Katy Sutcliffe, G J Melendez-Torres, Ruth Garside, Hassanat M Lawal, Noreen Orr, Liz Shaw, Jo Thompson Coon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simon BriscoeUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. s.briscoe@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-4521
Clara Martin PintadoUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Katy SutcliffeEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
G J Melendez-TorresUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Ruth GarsideUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Hassanat M LawalUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Noreen OrrUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Liz ShawUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jo Thompson CoonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR200695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with a rare disease find it difficult to obtain a diagnosis and access appropriate services. Evidence suggests that this can lead to health inequity amongst the rare disease community, i.e. systemic, unfair and avoidable differences in health opportunities and outcomes. This scoping review aims to identify and describe evidence on health inequities experienced by the rare disease community with regards to receipt of a diagnosis and access to health and social care services.

methodsWe searched ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC, MEDLINE and Social Policy and Practice for relevant studies. Studies were double screened at title and abstract and full-text using pre-specified inclusion criteria. As this research was commissioned by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Policy Research Programme, primary studies were limited to UK settings. These were supplemented with international systematic reviews. We also applied a 2010 date limit. Relevant data were extracted and presented narratively and tabulated.

resultsOne hundred thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, including 96 primary studies and 40 systematic reviews. The most frequently occurring rare diseases were motor neurone disease, cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease. Seventeen types of inequity were identified: delayed diagnosis, lack of knowledge amongst clinicians, lack of information provision, limited services provision (across six different services), limited services for undiagnosed conditions, lack of care co-ordination; in addition, inequity was identified relating to place of residence, race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, age and disability.

conclusionThis review has drawn attention to experiences of the rare disease community with respect to receipt of a diagnosis and access to services which are different to experiences in the general population, and within the rare disease community itself. Some of these experiences are clearly attributable to factors which are unfair, avoidable and systemic, particularly those which relate to specific groups in the rare disease community. Experiences relating to delayed diagnosis, lack of knowledge, information, care co-ordination and access to various services, also appeared to indicate inequity. These issues are less likely to be encountered with respect to more common diseases experienced in the general population.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityRare DiseasesHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40506782
PMCPMC12164139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.