ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Evidence of inequities experienced by the rare disease community with respect to receipt of a diagnosis and access to services: a scoping review of UK and international evidence.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Experience of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Views from a Patient, His Physician and a Patient Association.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Diagnostic delay, care needs, and trust in healthcare among persons with rare disease and their next of kin living in Sweden.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Transition Care for Young People with Rare Bone and Mineral Conditions: A Scoping Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Evidence of health inequities across the rare disease patient care pathway: development of a toolkit using a conceptual framework.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- From patients to partners: evaluating a co-designed website for congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Acute Airway Crisis in Mucopolysaccharidosis VI: Management Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Educational attainment of individuals with lymphangioleiomyomatosis is a determinant of timely diagnosis and treatment uptake.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Navigating rare disorder healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Enhancing Equality, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Rare Disease Research in the United Kingdom.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with a rare disease find it difficult to obtain a diagnosis and access appropriate services. Evidence suggests that this can lead to health inequity amongst the rare disease community, i.e. systemic, unfair and avoidable differences in health opportunities and outcomes. This scoping review aims to identify and describe evidence on health inequities experienced by the rare disease community with regards to receipt of a diagnosis and access to health and social care services.
methodsWe searched ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC, MEDLINE and Social Policy and Practice for relevant studies. Studies were double screened at title and abstract and full-text using pre-specified inclusion criteria. As this research was commissioned by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Policy Research Programme, primary studies were limited to UK settings. These were supplemented with international systematic reviews. We also applied a 2010 date limit. Relevant data were extracted and presented narratively and tabulated.
resultsOne hundred thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, including 96 primary studies and 40 systematic reviews. The most frequently occurring rare diseases were motor neurone disease, cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease. Seventeen types of inequity were identified: delayed diagnosis, lack of knowledge amongst clinicians, lack of information provision, limited services provision (across six different services), limited services for undiagnosed conditions, lack of care co-ordination; in addition, inequity was identified relating to place of residence, race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, age and disability.
conclusionThis review has drawn attention to experiences of the rare disease community with respect to receipt of a diagnosis and access to services which are different to experiences in the general population, and within the rare disease community itself. Some of these experiences are clearly attributable to factors which are unfair, avoidable and systemic, particularly those which relate to specific groups in the rare disease community. Experiences relating to delayed diagnosis, lack of knowledge, information, care co-ordination and access to various services, also appeared to indicate inequity. These issues are less likely to be encountered with respect to more common diseases experienced in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.