ReviewJournal of eating disorders2025
Weight bias among undergraduate women with health-related majors: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWeight bias in healthcare has negative consequences for both patients and providers. While weight bias has been examined among healthcare professionals, understanding levels of bias during education may aid in understanding when bias is most salient and allow for targeted intervention to reduce bias. The objective of this systematic review was to describe the levels of explicit, internalized, and implicit weight bias among undergraduate women majoring in health-related fields.
methodsThis review was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023478263). A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, APA PsycINFO (Proquest), CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). Search terms centered on weight bias and undergraduate students studying health-related topics. Original research studies available in English that presented data on weight bias outcomes and presented data in the publication or provided data after being contacted for undergraduate women in health-related majors were included. Study quality was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Mean scores for quantitative scales and themes from qualitative studies were extracted and summarized.
resultsThe search produced 681 results; 14 studies were found eligible representing 3,260 women from eight countries. Eight different quantitative scales were used across 12 studies to assess aspects of weight bias; one assessed implicit weight bias and one subscale assessed internalized weight bias. Two of the 14 studies used qualitative methods. Most studies reported low or moderate weight bias but most scale developers did not include cut points. Scales relating to controllability of obesity or blame had scores most indicative of weight bias. DISCUSSION: Undergraduate women in health-related majors have levels of explicit weight bias similar to levels that have been reported in healthcare professionals. There have been limited studies assessing internalized weight bias, implicit weight bias, and qualitative assessments in undergraduate women majoring in health-related fields.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.