ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Retrograde tibial intramedullary nailing for distal tibial fractures: outcomes and complications.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetrograde tibial nailing (RTN) is a relatively new, minimally invasive technique for managing distal tibial fractures. Studies have demonstrated that RTN provides superior biomechanical stability compared to locking plates and yields favorable clinical outcomes. However, clinical data on RTN remain limited, particularly regarding its complication profile. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of RTN in distal tibial fracture treatment, with a focus on identifying and analyzing associated complications.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent RTN for distal tibial fractures between August 2020 and December 2023 at a Level I trauma center. Collected variables included patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture classification, operative time, length of hospital stays, time to radiographic union, time to full weight-bearing, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores at final follow-up, and postoperative complications.
resultsA total of 47 patients were included, with a follow-up duration ranging from 12 to 25 months (mean 17.0 ± 3.1 months). Radiographic union was achieved in 4 to 6 months (mean 4.5 ± 1.2 months). Full weight-bearing was resumed between 45 and 78 days postoperatively (mean 56.4 ± 11.2 days). Final AOFAS scores ranged from 73 to 95, with an average of 82.3 ± 9.2. Six complications were recorded: one case each of locking screw misplacement, posterior tibial tendon injury with associated ankle pain and swelling, medial ankle pain, loss of reduction, medial malleolus fracture, and superficial wound infection. No instances of implant failure, delayed union, nonunion, or deformity were observed.
conclusionRTN is an effective and reliable option for the treatment of distal tibial fractures, demonstrating favorable clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. Refinement of surgical techniques may further reduce the risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.