Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40506762›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Primer on large language models: an educational overview for intensivists.

Daphna Idan, Sharon Einav

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A pragmatic risk-stratified framework for using large language models in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evidence-Based Medicine: Past, Present, Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daphna IdanBen-Gurion Faculty of Health Sciences, Beer-Sheva, Israel. daphnaid@post.bgu.ac.il.
Sharon EinavHebrew University Faculty of Medicine and Regional Medical Director at Maccabi Healthcare and Chief Scientist, Medint Medical Intelligence, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning-enabled medical technologies into clinical practice is expanding at an unprecedented pace. Among these, large language models (LLMs) represent a subset of machine learning designed to comprehend linguistic patterns, semantics, and contextual meaning by processing vast amounts of textual data. This educational primer aims to inform intensivists on the foundational concepts of LLMs and how to approach emerging literature in this area. In critical care, LLMs have the potential to enhance various aspects of patient management, from triage and clinical documentation to diagnostic support and prognostic assessment of patient deterioration. They have also demonstrated high appropriateness in addressing critical care-related clinical inquiries and are increasingly recognized for their role in post-ICU rehabilitation and as educational resources for patients' families and caregivers. Despite these promising applications, LLMs still have significant limitations, and integrating LLMs into clinical workflows presents inherent challenges, particularly concerning bias, reliability, and transparency. Given their emerging role as decision-support tools and potential collaborative partners in medicine, LLMs must adhere to rigorous validation and quality assurance standards. As the trajectory toward AI-driven healthcare continues, responsible and evidence-based integration of LLMs into critical care practice is imperative to optimize patient outcomes while ensuring ethical and equitable deployment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLanguageCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsLarge Language ModelsMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceCritical careLarge language models

Identifiers

PMID40506762
PMCPMC12164094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.