ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Wearable device for axillary lymph node screening in breast cancer based on infrared thermography and artificial intelligence.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Infrared Thermography and Mammography in the Detection of Breast Cancer.Cureus · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-integrated wearable biomedical devices for cancer management.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- Decoding Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer: The Evolution From Radiomics to Topological Quantification for Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
- Time-to-Event Machine Learning Model Incorporating MRI-Derived Intratumoral Heterogeneity Score for Predicting Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Dual-Center Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Multiparametric MRI-Derived Habitat Radiomics in Subregional Analysis for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastatic Burden in Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide, and patients with metastasis to axillary lymph nodes (ALN) experience significantly lower survival rates. Current imaging-based screening methods often suffer from low sensitivity and limited accessibility for detecting ALN metastasis in breast cancer patients. In this study, we present an AI-based infrared thermography system for ALN metastasis detection to improve diagnostic accessibility and reduce intervention-related morbidity.
methodsIn this study, we curated an internal and external cohort for developing and accessing the deep learning model-based infrared thermography system. The internal cohort included 460 inpatient participants from Peking Union Medical College Hospital, randomly divided into a training set (70%) for model development and a hold-out internal validation set (30%) for initially model evaluation. The external cohort, consisting of 80 patients from both outpatient and inpatient departments recruited from Longfu Hospital, served for independent validation of the developed screening tool.
resultsThe developed model AI-IRT for axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis detection exhibited high diagnostic performance, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9424 and an accuracy of 0.8478 in the internal validation set, with a sensitivity of 0.8958 and specificity of 0.8222. In a tertiary classification scenario, the model produced an AUC of 0.8936, with corresponding accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values of 0.7246, 0.7246, and 0.7852, respectively. In the external validation set, the AI-IRT system achieved an AUC of 0.881 and an accuracy of 0.875, with a sensitivity of 0.892 and specificity of 0.861. For the tertiary classification, the model attained an AUC of 0.771 and an accuracy of 0.613, with both sensitivity and specificity at 0.613 and 0.695, respectively.
conclusionEvaluated on both curated internal and external cohorts, the proposed AI-IRT demonstrated strong performance across multiple centers, highlighting its potential to enhance pre-operative and intra-operative decision-making in the treatment of breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.