ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Image analysis:
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Diagnostic performance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) PET: A Scoping Review of Emerging Oncologic and Fibroinflammatory Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bridging Research and Clinical Practice: Automated [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable multi-center machine learning model driven by facial image features for non-invasive early risk assessment of lung cancer.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary lesions inconclusive in MATERIALS AND
methods20 histologically confirmed pulmonary lesions (13 lung cancer, 7 benign) in 19 patients were evaluated. All patients underwent an inconclusive
resultsThe texture parameters HIST Maximum grey level (AUC = 0.901), HIST Mean (AUC = 0.802), HIST Mode (AUC = 0.835), HIST Range (AUC = 0.901) and GLCM Information correlation 1 (AUC = 0.824) showed significant differences between lung cancer and benign pulmonary lesions. AUC values of conventional parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, TBR(SUVmax), TBR(SUVmean)) were 0.791, 0.868, 0.802 and 0.857, respectively. Maximum AUC values of bivariable logistic regression were 0.967 and 0.978 for two texture parameters and the combination of conventional and texture parameters, respectively. Correlations between texture parameter pairs were mainly moderate (0.4≤ρ≤0.59). 2/5 texture parameters (HIST Mean, HIST Mode) displayed no very strong correlations (0.8≤ρ≤1.00) to any conventional parameters or lesion volume.
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.