Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40506735›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Selective recruitment of beneficial microbes in the rhizosphere of maize affected by microbial inoculants, farming practice, and seasonal variations.

Ioannis D Kampouris, Theresa Kuhl-Nagel, Jan Helge Behr, Loreen Sommermann, Doreen Babin, Davide Francioli, Rita Zrenner, Susanne Kublik, Michael Schloter, Uwe Ludewig and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ioannis D Kampouris *Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany. ioannis.kampouris@julius-kuehn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-5930
Theresa Kuhl-Nagel *Plant-Microbe Systems, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Großbeeren, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4711-6129
Jan Helge BehrPlant-Microbe Systems, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Großbeeren, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-9251
Loreen SommermannDepartment of Agriculture, Ecotrophology and Landscape Development, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Bernburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6293-877X
Doreen BabinJulius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7144-8898
Davide FrancioliDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6572-3574
Rita ZrennerPlant-Microbe Systems, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Großbeeren, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-8942
Susanne KublikInstitute for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-8223
Michael SchloterInstitute for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-1125
Uwe LudewigDepartment of Nutritional Crop Physiology, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5456-1055
Kornelia SmallaJulius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-5560
Günter NeumannDepartment of Nutritional Crop Physiology, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-2815
Rita Grosch *Plant-Microbe Systems, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Großbeeren, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7179-5715
Joerg Geistlinger *Department of Agriculture, Ecotrophology and Landscape Development, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Bernburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-2819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant beneficial microorganisms as inoculants can improve crop performance, but factors affecting their impact on plant performance under field conditions remain unclear, thereby limiting their use in farming. Here, we investigated how farming practices (e.g., tillage and N-fertilization intensity) and growing seasons influenced the impact of a beneficial microorganism consortium (BMc: Trichoderma, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas strains) in maize and affected the rhizosphere competence of each BMc strain. In addition, we tested whether the consortium affects the resident rhizosphere microbiome and crop performance. In two growing seasons (2020 and 2021), we assessed how BMc inoculation affects maize growth, nutritional status, gene expression, and rhizosphere microbiome under different farming practices at the flowering stage.

resultsInoculated strains successfully colonized the maize rhizosphere independently of farming practice. BMc inoculation improved plant growth and iron uptake in 2020, regardless of farming practice. These effects co-occurred with lower precipitation levels in 2020 compared to 2021. BMc inoculation reduced the expression of several stress-related genes in maize in 2020 under drought. An increased iron uptake by the BMc-inoculated plants was observed in 2020 and was associated with the upregulation of the gene ZmNAS3, which is linked to iron uptake. Therefore, BMc inoculation mitigated the drought impact on maize. The microbial rhizosphere communities were altered by BMc inoculation in both years, but patterns of responder taxa differed between seasons. Metagenome analysis revealed that more genes (e.g., genes encoding biosurfactants and siderophores) were enriched in the rhizosphere of BMc-inoculated plants in 2020 than in 2021. Moreover, we identified bacterial and fungal taxa positively associated with maize iron uptake. The relative abundance of these iron uptake-associated bacterial and fungal taxa significantly increased due to BMc inoculation in 2020, while they showed overall higher relative abundances in 2021, independently of BMc inoculation. We mapped the sequences of these iron-associated taxa to publicly available genomes and verified the occurrence of various plant beneficial traits in several mapped genomes.

conclusionsOverall, we show that the growing season determined the effect of BMc inoculation on maize plants by shaping microbiome composition and function in the maize rhizosphere more than farming practice. These findings highlight the importance of the complex interplay between microbial inoculants and the resident rhizosphere microorganisms under abiotic stress conditions.

Indexed as

Amplicon sequencingBacteriaFungiIron acquisitionMetagenome sequencingMicrobiomePlant stress responsesRhizosphere competence

Identifiers

PMID40506735
PMCPMC12164104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.