ArticleVirology journal2025
Multiplex detection of respiratory RNA viruses without amplification based on CRISPR-Cas13a immunochromatographic test strips.
Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Update and optimization of a multiplex RT-qPCR assay to overcome diagnostic failure in emerging influenza A(H3N2) subclades J.2 and K (Peru, 2024-2026).IJID regions · 2026Article
- Bacterial defense systems: Mechanisms, homology to eukaryotic immune systems, and applications.Zoological research · 2026Review
- Early Warning Signs for Monitoring Airborne Respiratory Virus Transmission.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Simultaneous and sensitive detection ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute respiratory infections, caused by RNA viruses like respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, rhinovirus, and coronavirus, are major global health threats. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the gold standard for detecting these viruses but is time-consuming, complex, and requires specialized equipment. There is a need for rapid, convenient, and multi-target detection methods to improve disease prevention and control. This study developed a multi-target immunochromatographic detection method using LbuCas13a protein and "band elimination" test strips for detecting SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus. The method's performance was evaluated by testing known 5 positive and 4 negative samples for SARS-CoV-2 and comparing results with fluorescent PCR and colloidal gold methods. Detection sensitivity was quantified using digital PCR and qPCR. The immunochromatographic test strips showed 100% concordance with fluorescent PCR and colloidal gold methods in initial clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Subsequently, we used dual-target immunochromatographic test strips to detect 9 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples and 9 H3N2 positive samples. However, false negatives were observed in dual-target detection of SARS-CoV-2 and H3N2 samples, likely due to low sample concentration or sample degradation. The method had a minimum detection limit of 381.75 copies/µL, as determined by digital PCR and qPCR. The developed multi-target immunochromatographic detection method offers a rapid, low-cost, and simple approach for detecting both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. With high sensitivity, specificity, and reliability, this method holds promise as a practical tool for RNA virus diagnosis and improving public health response to respiratory infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.