Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40506724›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2025

Beyond venomous fangs: Uloboridae spiders have lost their venom but not their toxicity.

Xiaojing Peng, Ludwig Dersch, Josephine Dresler, Tim Lüddecke, Tim Dederichs, Peter Michalik, Steve Peigneur, Jan Tytgat, Afrah Hassan, Antonio Mucciolo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Spiders Without Venom as New Sources of Peptidase Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaojing PengDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Ludwig DerschAnimal Venomics Lab, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Ohlebergsweg 12, Gießen, 35392, Germany.
Josephine DreslerAnimal Venomics Lab, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Ohlebergsweg 12, Gießen, 35392, Germany.
Tim LüddeckeAnimal Venomics Lab, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Ohlebergsweg 12, Gießen, 35392, Germany.
Tim DederichsZoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Loitzer Straße 26, Greifswald, 17489, Germany.
Peter MichalikZoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Loitzer Straße 26, Greifswald, 17489, Germany.
Steve PeigneurToxicology and Pharmacology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 922, Louvain, 3000, Belgium.
Jan TytgatToxicology and Pharmacology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 922, Louvain, 3000, Belgium.
Afrah HassanDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Antonio MuccioloElectron Microscopy Facility, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc Robinson-RechaviDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Giulia ZancolliDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland. giulia.zancolli@gmail.com.

Funding

European Commission 845674Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 205460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenom, one of nature's most potent secretions, has played a crucial role in the evolutionary success of many animal groups, including spiders. However, Uloboridae spiders appear to lack venom and capture their prey, unlike venomous spiders, by extensive silk-wrapping and regurgitation of digestive fluids onto the entire prey package. A prevailing hypothesis posits that toxins may have been reallocated from the venom to alternative secretions, like silk or digestive fluids. Yet, whether uloborids have retained venom toxins and the mechanisms underlying prey immobilisation remain unresolved. Here, we employed a multi-disciplinary approach to assess the absence of venom glands in Uloborus plumipes, toxin gene expression and toxicity of digestive proteins.

resultsOur findings confirm that U. plumipes lacks a venom apparatus, while neurotoxin-like transcripts were highly expressed in the digestive system. Midgut extract had comparable toxicity levels to that of the venomous Parasteatoda tepidariorum. However, no inhibitory effects on sodium nor potassium channels were observed, indicating a different toxic mechanism.

conclusionsThese findings support the hypothesis that Uloboridae spiders have lost their venom apparatus while retaining toxin-like genes. The potent toxicity of their digestive fluids, a trait conserved across spiders, likely compensate for the absence of venom, ensuring effective prey immobilisation and digestion.

Indexed as

SpidersSpider VenomsAnimalsPredatory BehaviorSpider VenomsDefensinDigestive fluidsEvolutionSecondary lossToxinsUloboridae

Identifiers

PMID40506724
PMCPMC12164160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.