ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025
Regional and whole-brain neurofunctional alterations during pain empathic processing of physical but not affective pain in migraine patients.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Migraine with Focal Cortical Dysplasia: A Case Report.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Brain structural MRI changes before and after 6 months of preventive treatment with erenumab and onabotulinumtoxinA in migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Mesocorticolimbic circuitry in episodic migraine: reward- and punishment-related responses and resting-state connectivity.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Common and distinct neurofunctional signatures of dynamic naturalistic emotion regulation strategies.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccumulating evidence suggests that migraine patients present abnormal brain responses to salient sensory and emotional stimuli. However, it is still unclear whether this is a generalized or domain-specific phenomenon. Employing a well-validated fMRI paradigm, we investigated pain empathic reactivity across two domains: observation of physical pain (noxious stimulation) and affective pain (facial expressions). On the basis of a generalized hyperexcitability/hyperreactivity in migraine, we hypothesized abnormal responses to both dimensions of pain empathy.
methodsWe collected fMRI and psychometric data from 21 migraine patients and matched controls. Univariate and multivariate neuroimaging analyses were utilized to examine domain-specific dysregulations in (a) neural reactivity in meta-analytically defined shared regions of pain-empathy processing, and (b) whole-brain neurofunctional signatures of physical and affective pain empathy (VPS, Zhou et al., 2020). Logistic regression models and machine learning-based classification were employed to determine differences between groups (migraine or control).
resultsMigraine patients exhibit increased neural responses during empathy for physical pain in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (slightly more pronounced on the right side), with alterations on the right significantly associated with the pain experienced during the attack. On the whole-brain level, the predictive accuracy of the VPS for physical pain empathy was shown to be significantly higher for patients as compared to controls, reaching 100% accuracy. Across analyses, we did not find evidence of altered empathy processing for affective pain.
conclusionsContrary to our hypothesis, our results indicate that migraine patients present a domain-specific increased brain responsivity, localized in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus but also extending to subtle whole brain patterns, during empathy for physical pain stimuli, but not during empathy for affective pain. Based on the evidence that the neural pathways for empathy for physical pain and experimental pain robustly overlap, these results indicate a specific hyperresponsivity of the pain pathways, with the inferior frontal gyrus likely playing a regulatory role in modulating pain-related processes. Finally, the results underscore the translational application potential of neuroaffective multivariate signatures as neuromarkers for pathological dysregulations in affective and pain-related processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.