ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025
Defining the Role of Postoperative Radio-Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPostoperative radio-hormone therapy plays a significant role in management of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP), particularly in efforts to reduce biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis, and improve overall survival. BCR rates can be upwards of 50-70% at 5 years, highlighting the need for optimized risk stratification and consideration of multimodal treatment approaches. The purpose of this review is to highlight evidence-based treatment recommendations, and call attention to the importance of personalized therapeutic strategies after RP. RECENT
findingsBoth radiotherapy (RT) and ADT have been shown to optimize survival outcomes and to reduce disease progression in patients with persistent PSA, pathologic lymph-node positive disease, and adverse pathology. Early salvage RT (SRT) is typically a preferred treatment approach as it allows for treatment intensification only when clinically indicated, avoiding unnecessary radiation in men who may never recur. ADT is often added to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to enhance treatment efficacy, particularly in patients with high-risk features, though in selected lower-risk scenarios, radiation alone may be sufficient. Short-term ADT is appropriate for low-intermediate risk patients and long-term is appropriate for patients with advanced pathological features or nodal involvement. For certain high-risk pathologic findings, such as positive surgical margins and seminal vesicle invasion (T3b), adjuvant RT (aRT) may be indicated to optimize disease control. Overall, radio-hormone therapy plays a significant role in the postoperative setting by reducing the risk of recurrence and disease progression, and improving survival outcomes. There are several well-validated tools that may offer personalized risk assessments to identify which patients may most benefit from adjuvant or salvage therapies. Finally, the optimal use of such therapies continues to be investigated with ongoing trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.