ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Describing phenotypes in FSHD: an update of the comprehensive clinical evaluation form.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging of Facial Muscles in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: An Exploratory Study Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Sphingolipid Remodeling and Extracellular Vesicle Signatures Reflect Disease Severity in Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy Driven by Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Russian FSHD registry: a first look at the cohort.Human genetics · 2026Article
- Camptocormia as a Phenotypic Variant of FSHD in the Elderly: Clinical, Genetic, and Imaging Features.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFacioscapolohumeral muscular dystrophy is characterized by a wide clinical variability; the underlying reasons and the relation between them and the genetic markers are still not clear. In fact, the different phenotypes could show a different disease progression and/or imply distinct genetic mechanisms. As clinical trials are approaching also for FSHD, the correct description and stratification of patients becomes mandatory. To address these matters, in 2016 the Italian Clinical Group for FSHD developed the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form (CCEF), aimed at describing the different observed phenotypes in FSHD.
methodsA working group composed by the former developers of the CCEF and other expert clinicians re-evaluated the whole structure of the CCEF, to develop a simplified version for use in clinical practice; also, other expert clinicians not referring to the Italian Clinical Group for FSHD read and approved the CCEF revised version for its international use.
resultsWe present the CCEF-R, a revised and simplified version of the CCEF, that while maintaining all the core structure and items of the previous validated version, has been modified with new friendlier graphics, focused on the key anamnestic and neurological examination findings, to facilitate its understanding and use in clinical practice.
conclusionsThe phenotypical classification combined with the genetic signature should be considered during the diagnostic work out for guiding genetic analysis and for genotype-phenotype correlations and genetic counseling. The CCEF could have a significant role in the clinical stratification process of patients for clinical trials and in laying the groundwork for evidence-based medical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40506648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.