Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40506578›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Utility of pH monitoring in surgical decision-making and outcome prediction in revisional antireflux surgery for anatomical failure.

Inanc S Sarici, Sven E Eriksson, Naveed Chaudhry, Ping Zheng, Johnathan Nguyen, Shahin Ayazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inanc S SariciForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Sven E ErikssonForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Naveed ChaudhryForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Ping ZhengForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Johnathan NguyenForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Shahin AyaziForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA. shahin.ayazi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8113-9164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntireflux surgery (ARS) is effective for controlling GERD, but 10-20% of patients experience anatomical failure, and 3-7% eventually require revisional surgery. While pH monitoring is routinely used preoperatively, its role in guiding revisional ARS remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the role of pH monitoring in predicting the need for and outcomes of revisional ARS.

methodsWe reviewed 278 patients (68% female, mean age 55) with anatomical failure after fundoplication who underwent 48-h pH monitoring from 2015 to 2023. Patients were stratified by DeMeester score at failure: normal vs. abnormal (≥ 14.7). Primary outcome was need for revisional ARS. Secondary outcome was favorable outcome at 1-year post-revision, defined as freedom from PPIs and patient satisfaction. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the impact of pH monitoring on need for and outcome of revisional ARS.

resultsAbnormal DeMeester scores were found in 132 patients (47.5%), who had higher rates of simultaneously herniated and disrupted fundoplication (48.5 vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001), longer median (IQR) time to failure [54.9 (20.9-121.0) vs. 27.9 (14.8-77.8) months, p = 0.004], and higher GERD-HRQL heartburn scores (p < 0.05). These patients were more likely to undergo revisional ARS (68.9 vs. 47.3%, p < 0.001), confirmed on multivariable analysis [OR 2.36 (1.28-4.37), p = 0.006]. At 14 (3) months post-revision, patients with abnormal DeMeester scores had higher rates of patient satisfaction (82.9 vs. 65.5%, p = 0.026) and freedom from PPIs (77.6 vs. 60.3%, p = 0.037) with lower GERD-HRQL total scores [7.0 (2.0-21.5) vs. 14.0 (6.0-32.0), p = 0.003]. Abnormal DeMeester score was the strongest predictor of favorable outcomes after revisional ARS [OR 3.98 (1.75-9.04), p = 0.001].

conclusionAbnormal DeMeester score at time of failure predicts need for revisional ARS and is the strongest predictor of favorable outcome after revisional ARS, underscoring its role in surgical decision-making after failure.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingEsophageal pH MonitoringFundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxReoperationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureAntireflux surgeryBravo pH monitoringNissen fundoplicationRevisional surgery

Identifiers

PMID40506578
PMCPMC12287147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.