Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Impact of PRECEDE-PROCEED model on enhancing neonatal sleep safety practices.
Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe neonatal period is the most vulnerable stage of life, and safe sleep practices are crucial in preventing asphyxia and sudden infant death syndrome. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model is a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing health needs for designing and implementing health programs. This study aimed to explore the application and effectiveness of an intervention based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model in improving neonatal sleep safety caregiving behaviors.
methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, neonatal caregivers from the obstetrics department of a tertiary hospital in Jiangsu Province, China, were recruited between May and August 2024. Using the PRECEDE-PROCEED model as a guiding framework, the study assessed caregivers' baseline knowledge and practices concerning neonatal sleep safety and identified barriers to effective neonatal sleep safety. In the PRECEDE phase, the current state of neonatal caregivers' knowledge, behaviors, and barriers was analyzed. These barriers were categorized into predisposing factors (e.g., caregivers' knowledge, awareness, and motivation), enabling factors (e.g., access to resources and external support), and reinforcing factors (e.g., feedback from others). Targeted interventions were then implemented accordingly. In the PROCEED phase, the effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated, feedback was collected, and the intervention strategy was continuously adjusted and optimized. Lastly, data were gathered through questionnaires and direct on-site observations, and a comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate changes in caregivers' knowledge, practices, and perceived self-efficacy before and after the intervention.
resultsFollowing the intervention, neonatal caregivers exhibited a significant improvement in their knowledge of neonatal sleep safety compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Their caregiving practices became more standardized, with notably higher accuracy rates in sleep posture selection and sleep environment arrangement, in contrast to the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, caregivers also exhibited a significant increase in self-efficacy scores after the intervention (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe PRECEDE-PROCEED model proved effective in identifying barriers to caregiving practices and facilitated the development of targeted interventions, resulting in substantial improvements in caregivers' knowledge and adherence to best practices for neonatal sleep safety. Additionally, the model contributed to enhancing caregivers' self-efficacy. These outcomes are crucial for the ongoing improvement of caregiving practices and the promotion of neonatal sleep safety. Lastly, the use of this model may contribute to a decrease in the risk of sudden infant death syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40506559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.