ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
Growth kinetics of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: implications for early detection.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Exploratory In Silico Analysis ofCancers · 2026Article
- Rethinking ovarian cancer III: the past decade and future directions.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Article
- Immune heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance in gynecological malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Clinical Evaluation of a Multi-Omic Diagnostic Model for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most lethal gynaecological cancer with patients routinely diagnosed at advanced stages. Evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates that annual screening may not reduce cancer-related deaths. We aim to characterise the growth kinetics of HGSOC to understand why early detection failed and under what conditions it might prove fruitful.
methodsWe analysed data from 597 HGSOC patients and identified 34 cases with serial CT scans. We calculated the growth rates of lesions in the ovaries/pelvis and the omentum and estimated the time to metastasis using a Gompertz model. Finally, we simulated ultrasound and CA125 based screening in a virtual population of patients.
resultsGrowing lesions in the ovaries and the omentum doubled in volume every 2.2 months and 1.8 months respectively. The 11 cases with growing lesions in both sites had a median interval of 13.1 months between disease initiation and the onset of metastasis. Our simulations suggested that 27% of tumours would metastasise before screen detection. The remainder would provide a median window of 4.2 months for detection before metastasis.
conclusionOur results suggest that HGSOC lesions have short times to metastasis, preventing effective early detection using current screening approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.