ArticleHeredity2025
Rate of de novo mutations in the three-spined stickleback.
Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recombination accelerates adaptation across genetic architectures and demographic histories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The rate and spectrum of germline mutations in chicken from a commercial pedigree line.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- How precise are mutation rate estimates? Comparison of different approaches to estimate de novo mutation rates.Heredity · 2026Article
- Complex Patterns of Hitchhiking Mutation Load Among Stickleback Populations.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Germline de novo mutation rate of the highly heterozygous amphioxus genome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- T2T Genomes Unveil Centromere Architecture and Adaptive Divergence in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Determinants of de novo mutations in extended pedigrees of 43 dog breeds.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a fundamentally important genetic parameter and evolutionary force, germline mutation rates have many applications in evolutionary biology. However, accurate estimates of de novo mutation (DNM) rates are still relatively scarce, even for extensively studied evolutionary biology models. We estimated DNM rates for the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), the 'supermodel' of ecology and evolutionary biology. Using a large number of family trios sequenced to 45x coverage, we identified 115 unique mutations genome-wide and estimated the DNM rate at µ = 5.11 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.