Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40506483›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Cochlear gene therapy restores hearing and auditory processing in an atypical DFNB9 mouse model.

Najate Benamer, Hélène Le Ribeuz, Chloé Felgerolle, Charlotte Calvet, Olivier Postal, Baptiste Plion, Mauricio Saenz-Roldan, Marie Giorgi, Marie-José Lecomte, Yann Nguyen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Najate BenamerUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-1509
Hélène Le RibeuzUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.
Chloé FelgerolleUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-375X
Charlotte CalvetUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.
Olivier PostalUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.
Baptiste PlionUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.
Mauricio Saenz-RoldanUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6240-5967
Marie GiorgiUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5505-7165
Marie-José LecomteUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5097-6798
Yann NguyenUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.
Christine PetitUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9069-002X
Nicolas MichalskiUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-2709
Boris GourévitchUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France.
Omar AkilUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94115-1330, USA.
Saaid SafieddineUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, F-75012, France. saaid.safieddine@pasteur.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-0572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe autosomal recessive deafness 9 (DFNB9) is caused by mutations in the otoferlin gene that accounts for 2-8% of all inherited deafness cases. In a previous study, we demonstrated that Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy restored hearing in a preclinical mouse model of profound DFNB9 deafness caused by a frameshift mutation leading to a complete loss of otoferlin expression. However, it remains to be demonstrated that it can address the full spectrum of DFNB9 deafness severity, while also restoring central auditory processing essential for speech understanding.

methodsUsing homologous recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells, we created a knock-in mouse model carrying the E1799del otoferlin mutation, which mirrors the human E1804del variant linked to DFNB9 deafness, characterized by moderate-to-profound deafness during febrile episodes in affected individuals. A mixture of male and female mice was used at P2, P8, and P30. Some were followed for up to 4 months for longevity monitoring and behavioral tests.

resultsThe mouse model exhibits abnormal otoferlin distribution, failure of synaptic transmission in inner hair cells, and profound hearing loss, all of which is restored to normal through AAV gene therapy. Notably, we conduct objective behavioral testing to provide the first evidence that gene therapy administered to the cochlea, which is part of the peripheral auditory system, can restore frequency discrimination, indicating the recovery of central auditory processing. This is achieved even when treatment is administered late at the end of the critical period.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that gene therapy can address the entire spectrum of DFNB9 hearing loss, and that profound deafness during critical period may not impede the restoration of central auditory processing.

Identifiers

PMID40506483
PMCPMC12162826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.