ArticleScientific reports2025
Exposure to vibrotactile music improves audiometric performances in individuals with cochlear implants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wearable interactive full-body motion tracking and haptic feedback network systems with deep learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vibrotactile stimulation has been shown to enhance the music listening experience of cochlear implant (CI) users. However, while existing studies have focused on music perception, significant gaps remain in our understanding of how music induces emotions in CI users and the role of vibrotactile stimulation in this process. Furthermore, the after-effects of audio-vibrotactile music listening on audiometric test performances have not yet been investigated on CI users. This paper presents a study in which two groups of twelve CI users were each exposed to music alone and to music with concurrent vibrotactile stimulation delivered via a vest enhanced with actuators. Standardized tonal and speech tests were conducted before and after both types of exposure (audio and audio-vibrotactile). In particular, speech audiometry was conducted in the quiet condition (with no masking sounds) for the first group and with the competing sounds for the second group. Results from both groups consistently showed that the exposure to tactile music significantly enhanced CI users' ability to decode tonal and speech signals compared to the effect resulting from exposure to sounds alone. The majority of participants preferred listening to music with concurrent vibrations over an audio-only experience, as it led to higher levels of immersion and engagement. Consistent with findings from previous studies on individuals with normal hearing, an increase in arousal in CI users was observed in the audio-vibrotactile condition compared to the absence of vibrations, regardless of the type of emotion being conveyed. Nevertheless, participants emphasized the need for vibrotactile devices to incorporate personalization mechanisms, allowing them to dynamically adjust vibration intensity for different body parts. These findings may open the door to novel therapeutic approaches for CI users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.