ArticleNature communications2025
AI-Based screening for thoracic aortic aneurysms in routine breast MRI.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of co-registration on lesion characterization in diffusion-weighted breast MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognosis for thoracic aortic aneurysms is significantly worse for women than men, with a higher mortality rate observed among female patients. The increasing use of magnetic resonance breast imaging (MRI) offers a unique opportunity for simultaneous detection of both breast cancer and thoracic aortic aneurysms. We retrospectively validate a fully-automated artificial neural network (ANN) pipeline on 5057 breast MRI examinations from public (Duke University Hospital/EA1141 trial) and in-house (Erlangen University Hospital) data. The ANN, benchmarked against 3D-ground-truth segmentations, clinical reports, and a multireader panel, demonstrates high technical robustness (dice/clDice 0.88-0.91/0.97-0.99) across different vendors and field strengths. The ANN improves aneurysm detection rates by 3.5-fold compared with routine clinical readings, highlighting its potential to improve early diagnosis and patient outcomes. Notably, a higher odds ratio (OR = 2.29, CI: [0.55,9.61]) for thoracic aortic aneurysms is observed in women with breast cancer or breast cancer history, suggesting potential further benefits from integrated simultaneous assessment for cancer and aortic aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.