SynthesisInternational wound journal2025
Bioimpedance Measurement for Monitoring Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- Correction to "Bioimpedance Measurement for Monitoring Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review".International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic wounds decrease patients' quality of life and pose an economic burden on healthcare systems and individuals. Wound assessment tools and monitoring technologies may reduce the costs related to chronic wound management. Bioimpedance has attracted growing attention as a quantitative tool for monitoring chronic ulcers, owing to its proven ability to detect tissue changes throughout the wound healing process. The main objective of this study was to review the state-of-the-art literature on the use of bioimpedance in chronic wound monitoring. A systematic review of literature was performed on the 30th of August 2024 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines in three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review. Studies on bioimpedance measurements for chronic lower leg wound monitoring were analysed, confirming significant differences in bioimpedance between wound and healthy skin, with changes observed throughout the healing process. The variety of electrode types and setups highlights the method's complexity, with electrode configuration playing a critical role in ensuring accurate results. Several challenges remain before it can be effectively implemented in clinical practice. Our review emphasises the potential usefulness of bioimpedance-based methods in monitoring chronic wounds on the lower legs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.