Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40505690›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2025

Bioimpedance Measurement for Monitoring Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.

Magdalena Antoszewska, Katarzyna Połomska, Piotr Spychalski, Atte Kekonen, Jari Viik, Wioletta Barańska-Rybak

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena AntoszewskaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-6788
Katarzyna PołomskaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Transplant Surgery and General Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
Piotr SpychalskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Transplant Surgery and General Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
Atte KekonenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Jari ViikFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Wioletta Barańska-RybakDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds decrease patients' quality of life and pose an economic burden on healthcare systems and individuals. Wound assessment tools and monitoring technologies may reduce the costs related to chronic wound management. Bioimpedance has attracted growing attention as a quantitative tool for monitoring chronic ulcers, owing to its proven ability to detect tissue changes throughout the wound healing process. The main objective of this study was to review the state-of-the-art literature on the use of bioimpedance in chronic wound monitoring. A systematic review of literature was performed on the 30th of August 2024 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines in three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review. Studies on bioimpedance measurements for chronic lower leg wound monitoring were analysed, confirming significant differences in bioimpedance between wound and healthy skin, with changes observed throughout the healing process. The variety of electrode types and setups highlights the method's complexity, with electrode configuration playing a critical role in ensuring accurate results. Several challenges remain before it can be effectively implemented in clinical practice. Our review emphasises the potential usefulness of bioimpedance-based methods in monitoring chronic wounds on the lower legs.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedanceWound HealingChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, Physiologicbioimpedancechronic woundshard‐to‐heal woundswound monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40505690
PMCPMC12162137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.