ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Idiopathic subglottic stenosis: Two cases report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceIdiopathic subglottic stenosis is a rare condition that primarily affects young women, with an etiology that remains poorly understood. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two cases of patients presenting with acute laryngeal dyspnea secondary to idiopathic subglottic stenosis. Clinical and paraclinical evaluations ruled out infectious, immunological, and iatrogenic causes. Treatment consisted of endoscopic procedures, including balloon dilation, CO₂ laser vaporization, and intralesional injections of corticosteroids and 5-fluorouracil. One patient required CO₂ laser incision of the inferior constrictor muscle due to recurrence. After prolonged follow-up, the clinical outcome was favorable, with no significant recurrence. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The etiology of idiopathic subglottic stenosis remains uncertain. A plethora of therapeutic alternatives have been proposed; however, none has demonstrated superiority in terms of ease and efficacy. Until more is known about the condition, prolonged postoperative clinical, radiological, and endoscopic monitoring is essential, even in cases where only the slightest recurrence of clinical signs is observed.
conclusionsThe management of this condition relies on a multidisciplinary approach, integrating endoscopic and surgical treatments tailored to the severity of the stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.