ReviewSleep medicine2025
Hypersomnolence in focus: a white paper of the 6th Think Tank World Sleep Forum.
Review in Sleep medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia on work-related outcomes: a systematic literature review.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An international expert group (European Sleep Foundation Think Tank) convened in 2022 to discuss the state of the evidence in the domain of hypersomnolence. The expert group considered the current state of knowledge based on the most relevant recent publications, discussed the current challenges in the field and identified future priorities. The purpose of this white paper is to summarize the definition, diagnosis, and pathophysiology of hypersomnolence, the epidemiology, phenotype, and management of hypersomnolence in obstructive sleep apnea and in neurological and psychiatric disorders, and the impact of hypersomnolence on daily activities, workability and health-related quality of life. The key results of the discussion were that: a) hypersomnolence is both prevalent and heterogeneous in its manifestations in a wide variety of pathological conditions encompassing obstructive sleep apnea and neurological and psychiatric disorders; and b) while multiple pathophysiological pathways are potentially involved in hypersomnolence, knowledge of the specific causal factors in individual patients remains undefined, and the specific factors responsible for excessive daytime sleepiness vs. excessive need for sleep remain largely unclear. The clinical implications of these results are the occurrence of important limitations to the development of personalized approaches to diagnosis, prognosis, and management of hypersomnolence, which is essential considering the high societal and personal costs of hypersomnolence, and its substantial adverse impact on quality of life. Research priorities should address these limitations with improved quantification of hypersomnolence and with an evidence base on the costs and benefit of hypersomnolence management in patients with respiratory, neurologic, and psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.