Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40505134›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Preuse Acceptance of a Family-Centered, Need-Based, and Interprofessional Perinatal Care Mobile Health Intervention: Exploratory Study.

Kristina Killinger, Verena Seyfried, Katharina Brusniak, Markus Wallwiener, Michael Abou-Dakn, Dorothea Scholle, Stephanie Wallwiener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristina KillingerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany, 49 62215632078.ORCID 0009-0008-8469-8405
Verena SeyfriedDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany, 49 62215632078.ORCID 0009-0007-1035-4274
Katharina BrusniakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Florence-Nightingale-Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2005-9432
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4139-9340
Michael Abou-DaknDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Joseph's Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3256-6282
Dorothea ScholleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Joseph's Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-0954-3108
Stephanie WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2045-650X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The perinatal period is one of the most vulnerable times a woman experiences. Multidimensional, interprofessional, and personalized support is needed to improve outcomes in women's and children's health while strengthening partner relationships at the same time. Although a vast amount of support services already exist in Germany for psychosocial counseling during the perinatal period, groups who are especially at risk do not take advantage of them. Objective: Family eNav is an app-based intervention developed by experts in the field of medical and psychosocial support to help young parents navigate through primary and secondary care services in Germany according to their needs. It also empowers patient and parenting perspectives through self-education and symptom monitoring for different settings, for example, mental health and preterm birth. While the intervention will be evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, the focus here lies on the conception of the app, demand among patients, and preuse acceptance. Methods: During the conception phase, we conducted an explorative study with prospective users and experts in the perinatal psychosocial field to understand the need and preuse acceptance of the intervention. We interviewed 20 participants with a semistructured guide, analyzing their responses using systematic text condensation. Additionally, we conducted a short survey on general questions concerning digitalization within the health care system among the participants. Results: We established two main themes: (1) access and barriers to health care and psychosocial services and (2) high preuse acceptance of app-based intervention. Health care and psychosocial providers indicated that there is a high demand for their services, which cannot always be met immediately, and at the same time, they are doubtful of reaching those individuals most in need. Prospective users and health and social care providers alike showed great interest in the perinatal navigator and suggested a variety of needs and content requirements to be included. Regionality, availability, and individualized content were underlined as success factors for high user acceptance. Barriers consisted of data protection concerns, as well as denial of their own needs. Conclusions: Our findings show great acceptance for an app-based intervention on the part of both prospective users and service providers. Feedback on requirements and content, as well as possible barriers, was taken into consideration while developing the app.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerinatal CareTelemedicineAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMalePregnancyProspective Studiesdigital healtheHealthfamilyGermanymobile appneed-based careparentingpatient empowermentperinatalpreterm birthpreuse acceptancepsychosocial supportsmartphonesurveytelehealthtelemedicinewoman

Identifiers

PMID40505134
PMCPMC12202979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.