ArticleGenetics2025
Toward more sustainable research: reducing the environmental impact when working with Drosophila.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ever-increasing amounts of plastic waste and greenhouse gas emissions worldwide threaten our environment. Biomedical laboratories across the world generate serious amounts of plastic waste often disposed of via high-emission strategies. Achieving sustainability is imperative but requires awareness and knowledge of the regulations, available options, and their implications. To illustrate the thought processes involved, we showcase the Manchester Fly Facility which supports work with the genetic model organism Drosophila and serves 13 research groups. In 2022, we estimated ∼4 tonnes of "clinical" waste generation by the facility enriched with single-use polystyrene plastic containers, all frozen for 2 days and then incinerated. We calculate the resulting environmental and economic costs and compare them to practices reported to us from other fly facilities worldwide. We then discuss feasible management options, separately explaining alternative choices for (1) container materials, (2) the processing of genetically modified organisms, (3) re-use strategies, and (4) waste management procedures. This information hopefully raises awareness and understanding to incentivize laboratories worldwide to adopt more sustainable choices, as is permitted by their local infrastructure and regulations. To illustrate what can be achieved, we extrapolate the Manchester data from 2022 to a period of 10 years and calculate the impact of different management strategies, indicating that up to 80% of greenhouse gas emissions and 76% of plastic waste can be saved. The resulting economic savings are of further benefit and could be re-invested to pay for additional workforce, which may otherwise pose an important barrier to re-use scenarios in many countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.