Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40505109›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

Toward more sustainable research: reducing the environmental impact when working with Drosophila.

Milo Challiner, Saroj Saurya, Sanjai Patel, Jordan W Raff, Maggy Fostier, Andreas Prokop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milo ChallinerManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biology, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Saroj SauryaSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK.
Sanjai PatelManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biology, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Jordan W RaffSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK.
Maggy FostierManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biology, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Andreas ProkopManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biology, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8482-3298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ever-increasing amounts of plastic waste and greenhouse gas emissions worldwide threaten our environment. Biomedical laboratories across the world generate serious amounts of plastic waste often disposed of via high-emission strategies. Achieving sustainability is imperative but requires awareness and knowledge of the regulations, available options, and their implications. To illustrate the thought processes involved, we showcase the Manchester Fly Facility which supports work with the genetic model organism Drosophila and serves 13 research groups. In 2022, we estimated ∼4 tonnes of "clinical" waste generation by the facility enriched with single-use polystyrene plastic containers, all frozen for 2 days and then incinerated. We calculate the resulting environmental and economic costs and compare them to practices reported to us from other fly facilities worldwide. We then discuss feasible management options, separately explaining alternative choices for (1) container materials, (2) the processing of genetically modified organisms, (3) re-use strategies, and (4) waste management procedures. This information hopefully raises awareness and understanding to incentivize laboratories worldwide to adopt more sustainable choices, as is permitted by their local infrastructure and regulations. To illustrate what can be achieved, we extrapolate the Manchester data from 2022 to a period of 10 years and calculate the impact of different management strategies, indicating that up to 80% of greenhouse gas emissions and 76% of plastic waste can be saved. The resulting economic savings are of further benefit and could be re-invested to pay for additional workforce, which may otherwise pose an important barrier to re-use scenarios in many countries.

Indexed as

DrosophilaWaste ManagementAnimalsEnvironmentPlasticsPlasticscarbon footprintDrosophilalaboratory wastemicro plasticsresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID40505109
PMCPMC12341913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.