ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Gene expression inference based on graph neural networks using L1000 data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression profiles can serve as proxies for cellular states and provide valuable insights into the discovery of functional connections across diverse cellular contexts. A cost-effective method called L1000 has been developed to generate gene expression profiles for over a million different conditions. Since gene expression inference of this method relies on linear regression, nonlinear regression methods, including deep learning models, have been assessed. However, these approaches process gene expression data as a vector structure, motivating us to investigate whether nonlinear models based on a graph structure are more effective in capturing the relationships between genes underlying gene expression profiles. In this work, we show that the graph neural network (GNN) model with genes as nodes outperforms both linear and nonlinear non-GNN models in predicting gene expression values and expression-based gene rankings. Importantly, our GNN model requires ~10-fold less information than other models to achieve comparable performance. A strategic selection of input features, or incorporating an organ feature, from which the gene expression data are derived, further improves gene expression inference performance of the GNN model. Additionally, we evaluate the cross-platform generality of gene expression inference. Our study demonstrates that the transformation of RNA expression data into a graph structure effectively captures nonlinear correlations between genes, thereby enabling highly accurate and efficient prediction of gene expression profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.