ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Predicting high-risk factors for postoperative inadequate analgesia and adverse reactions in cesarean delivery surgery: a prospective study.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tegileridine versus Sufentanil for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Hydromorphone and Nalbuphine for Postcesarean Patient-Controlled Analgesia and Developing a Risk Prediction Model for Inadequate Analgesia.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Predictive modeling of labor epidural catheter replacement or conversion to spinal or general anesthesia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study (2017-2024).International journal of obstetric anesthesia · 2026Article
- Transforming perioperative care: The current landscape and future trajectory of artificial intelligence in anesthesia-A narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning for postoperative nausea and vomiting prediction in elderly orthopedic patients: a comparative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Application of machine learning for the prediction of post-operative nausea and vomiting in adult surgical patients - A systematic review.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Construction of a Preoperative Prediction Model for TACE Resistance in Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Flurbiprofen in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia and the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopy: a retrospective case-control study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Antepartum Depression Symptoms: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of high-risk factors for inadequate analgesia and adverse reactions in obstetric patients is critical for improving outcomes. This study developed a machine learning model to predict these factors and optimize anesthesia management in obstetric surgery. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective study included 763 obstetric patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery between December 2023 and May 2024. A machine-learning model for postoperative analgesia and adverse reactions (MLPIAAR) was constructed using 42 variables categorized into preoperative (18), intraoperative (12), and postoperative (12) factors. Ten algorithms were applied for model development. Model performance was optimized through 10-fold cross-validation and GridSearchCV. Evaluation metrics included receiver operating characteristic, area under the curve, accuracy, and precision. Model interpretability was enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Regression analysis explored PCA compression frequency, consumption, and satisfaction of PCA factors. Validation was performed using predicted values and scatter plots.
resultsOur study found 24.25% of patients experienced inadequate postoperative analgesia within 24 h. Postoperative nausea also occurred in 23.20% of patients. Simultaneously using dexamethasone and flurbiprofen axetil reduced both risks. However, pregnancy-induced hypertension and intraoperative shivering increased nausea risk. Postoperative vomiting occurred in 11.80% of patients, primarily associated with intravenous PCA type. Hydromorphone PCA showed a higher vomiting incidence than nalbuphine PCA. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting increased postoperative vomiting risk. Patients receiving diclofenac sodium and those with longer surgeries exhibited higher PCA compression frequencies and consumption. Higher preoperative Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores correlated with increased PCA consumption.
conclusionsThe MLPIAAR model predicted high-risk factors for inadequate analgesia, nausea, and vomiting in obstetric patients. Dexamethasone and flurbiprofen axetil reduced these risks, while hydromorphone PCA increased vomiting risk compared to nalbuphine PCA. Machine learning and SHAP are valuable for optimizing anesthesia and analgesia management in obstetrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.