Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504881›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Immune-associated molecular classification and prognosis signature of sepsis.

Zhiwei Li, Leyi Wang, Shuting Yang, Bin Luo, Yezi Liu, Mengsi Chen, Changmin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhiwei LiClinical Laboratory Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.
Leyi WangDepartment of Nursing, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.
Shuting YangClinical Laboratory Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.
Bin LuoClinical Laboratory Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3012-7368
Yezi LiuClinical Laboratory Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.
Mengsi ChenClinical Laboratory Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.
Changmin WangClinical Laboratory Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6754-8125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to explore the molecular subtypes of sepsis and the correlation between immune-related genes and the prognosis of patients with sepsis. Utilizing the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset (GSE65682) with 479 patients with sepsis as the training set and 164 patients treated at our hospital as the independent validation cohort. An unsupervised cluster analysis was used to identify potential molecular subtypes of sepsis, and a weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed to identify gene modules. Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes, and Genomes enrichment analyses were performed, and the immune status was also evaluated. Using LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression, an immune-related gene prognostic model was developed, validated, and evaluated, followed by an individual risk scoring system. We identified two molecular subtypes of sepsis that are associated with distinct immune response patterns and clinical outcomes. Patients in Cluster A exhibited poorer survival and enrichment of pro-inflammatory pathways, while those in Cluster B had better outcomes and enrichment of immune regulatory pathways. A 10-gene prognostic model was constructed, stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups using the estimated risk score that was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor in both the training (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.126, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.096-1.156, P < 0.001) and validation datasets (HR: 1.149, 95% CI: 1.085-1.216, P < 0.001). A risk scoring system was developed based on the risk score and clinical parameters, with estimated mortality probabilities of 0.132 (7-day), 0.211 (14-day), and 0.258 (21-day). High-risk patients had significantly worse prognoses, and this was validated in the independent cohort. Distinct immune cell profiles were found between the two subtypes and risk groups, with B cells, CD8 + T cells, and NK cells elevated in Cluster B. This study identified immune-related molecular subtypes of sepsis and developed a prognostic model that accurately predicts sepsis mortality. These findings provide insights into the immune dysregulation in sepsis and can potentially be used for developing personalized treatment strategies and improving clinical decision-making in sepsis management.

Indexed as

SepsisAgedCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40504881
PMCPMC12161593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.