ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025
Can we study whisker movements to gain insights into the natural sensory behaviours of mammals?
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Describing the whiskers of a semi-aquatic caniform: the Eurasian Otter (Journal of mammalogy · 2026Article
- Head and Whisker Behaviours Observed During Foraging in Northern Elephant Seals (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroscientists, behavioural scientists, mechanical engineers and roboticists collaborate in the broad field of whisker science to investigate tactile sensing and movement in mammals. Much of this research is focussed on the study of laboratory rodents, with important insights already gained from studying their whisker movements, control behaviours and the sensory processing of whisker signals. The findings of whisker behaviour studies in the laboratory have also formed the foundation for research in other captive settings, such as in zoos. However, without inspiration from more natural environments and stimuli, researchers are probably missing out on describing other important whisker behaviours, which may in turn give researchers better insights into the brain areas, signals and behaviours associated with active whisker touch sensing. Taking inspiration from recent findings from the field and zoo, developing more social and active foraging tasks for the laboratory would probably enrich whisker behaviour studies, as would including a wider variety of species. In the longer-term, a more integrated approach, with collaboration across laboratory, captive and field settings, will help to develop more natural behavioural tasks representative of what an animal experiences in the real world, which would give us greater insights into the natural sensory behaviours of mammals. This has implications for the fields of neuroscience, sensory biology and evolutionary biology, as well important applications for captive mammal health and welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.