Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504876›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025

Can we study whisker movements to gain insights into the natural sensory behaviours of mammals?

Robyn A Grant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robyn A GrantDepartment of Natural Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.ORCID 0000-0002-3968-8370

Funding

Royal Society (The Royal Society) APX∖R1∖211187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscientists, behavioural scientists, mechanical engineers and roboticists collaborate in the broad field of whisker science to investigate tactile sensing and movement in mammals. Much of this research is focussed on the study of laboratory rodents, with important insights already gained from studying their whisker movements, control behaviours and the sensory processing of whisker signals. The findings of whisker behaviour studies in the laboratory have also formed the foundation for research in other captive settings, such as in zoos. However, without inspiration from more natural environments and stimuli, researchers are probably missing out on describing other important whisker behaviours, which may in turn give researchers better insights into the brain areas, signals and behaviours associated with active whisker touch sensing. Taking inspiration from recent findings from the field and zoo, developing more social and active foraging tasks for the laboratory would probably enrich whisker behaviour studies, as would including a wider variety of species. In the longer-term, a more integrated approach, with collaboration across laboratory, captive and field settings, will help to develop more natural behavioural tasks representative of what an animal experiences in the real world, which would give us greater insights into the natural sensory behaviours of mammals. This has implications for the fields of neuroscience, sensory biology and evolutionary biology, as well important applications for captive mammal health and welfare.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMammalsVibrissaeAnimalsMovementTouchfieldlaboratorytouchvibrissaevibrotactilezoo

Identifiers

PMID40504876
PMCPMC12645561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.