Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504867›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Schistosomiasis and water resources development in Africa: A scoping review and multi-case evaluation of associated snail control.

May N Sule, Ibrahim El Lahham, Mutinta N Munkombwe, Patricia Nasike, Anouk Gouvras, David Rollinson, Rashid Mbaziira, Comfort Kanshio, Giulio A De Leo

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

May N SuleCentre for Water, Environment and Development, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1241-4812
Ibrahim El LahhamCentre for Water, Environment and Development, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.
Mutinta N MunkombweCentre for Water, Environment and Development, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.
Patricia NasikeCentre for Water, Environment and Development, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.
Anouk GouvrasGlobal Schistosomiasis Alliance, London, United Kingdom.
David RollinsonGlobal Schistosomiasis Alliance, London, United Kingdom.
Rashid MbaziiraAfrican Ministers' Council on Water (AMCOW), Asokoro Abuja, Nigeria.
Comfort KanshioAfrican Ministers' Council on Water (AMCOW), Asokoro Abuja, Nigeria.
Giulio A De LeoDepartment of Oceans and Woods Institute for the Environment, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, United States of America.

Funding

Cranfield UniversityNSF 2522282NSF DEB – 2011179UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWater resources development (WRD), specifically infrastructural man-made water bodies such as dams and irrigation schemes, are built to improve water supply, provide energy, and enhance food security. However, dams and irrigation schemes may lead to a dramatic increase in the prevalence of schistosomiasis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe conducted a scoping review of WRD impacts on schistosomiasis transmission risk in Africa using electronic databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature. From 1483 retrieved records, we assessed 186 full-text papers and identified 122 articles covering 54 dams and irrigation schemes in 32 African countries. We found that, although the relationship between WRD and schistosomiasis transmission risk is well-documented in the scientific literature, the vast majority of the approximately 1,600 medium- to large-sized dams currently operating in endemic regions of Africa lack before-and-after prevalence data necessary to evaluate their actual impact on schistosomiasis transmission. Our analysis revealed that rigorous epidemiological data to assess WRD's effects exist for only 11 dams across 9 countries. Additionally, only a limited number of studies provided information on schistosomiasis control methods, surveillance, or monitoring for WRD. Few countries have implemented engineering and biological snail control measures, some of which have proven effective, enabling us to identify successful interventions employed at various stages of the WRD lifecycle. Lastly, to assess these measures in detail, we selected case studies from Africa that illustrate the success and challenges of schistosomiasis control with regard to WRD, thus gaining insights of the global relevance of lessons learnt for the future development of water resources. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our analysis highlighted that an integrated and coordinated approach is vital for the successful control of schistosomiasis transmission risk associated with Water Resources Development. We provide key recommendations which could be adopted by the Continental Africa Water Investment Programme (AIP) with the ultimate goal of decreasing prevalence and moving towards elimination.

Indexed as

SchistosomiasisSnailsWater ResourcesWater SupplyAfricaAnimalsHumansPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID40504867
PMCPMC12193731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.