ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Understanding the drivers of poor infection prevention control (IPC) practices in Kenyan health facilities: An interdisciplinary study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facility-level determinants of infection prevention and control monitoring in Somalia: evidence from the 2024 Harmonized Health Facility Assessment.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving IPC practices in health facilities is a major concern for the global health community. This paper combines insights from rapid ethnographic research and epidemiological measures of IPC adherence undertaken in four health facilities of different sizes in western Kenya between November 2022 and January 2023. At the time of our research, the Covid-19 pandemic was a WHO-defined Public Health Emergency of International Concern, although the pandemic was subsiding, and there was an ongoing Ebola outbreak across the border in Uganda. Our findings evidence serious issues with adherence to standard IPC guidelines and the urgent need for reform of IPC practices. If the practices we observed are widespread beyond the study setting, we believe there is an urgent need to develop new interventions to improve adherence to IPC guidelines, with better follow-up to ensure interventions have long-term impact. The ethnographic material we present offers insights into the following IPC-related practices: (1) Hand hygiene (HH) and glove use; (2) Use of objects/material items; (3) Cleaning; (4) Waste disposal. When interrogated alongside epidemiological findings, our data offer preliminary evidence for understanding some of the social drivers for poor IPC adherence and the ways risky practice is embedded in organisational processes and personal perceptions of risk. We highlight the need to consider the social context of IPC behaviours in order to develop interventions which can deliver sustained change. Specific recommendations include better training and resources for cleaning and casual staff, and for a shift in emphasis in IPC interventions from health worker education towards modes of influencing sustained behaviour change.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.