ArticlePloS one2025
Association between sarcopenia and falls in Chinese older adults: Findings from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Sarcopenia Management Systems for Former Homeless Older Adults Residing in Supportive Housing: Mixed Methods Study.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between anion gap trajectories and mortality in patients with acute cholangitis: a cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia and fall-related outcomes in Chinese adults aged 45 years or older: a longitudinal cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy and skeletal muscle: A narrative review synthesizing adult evidence with implications for older adults.JAR life · 2026Review
- Association between sarcopenia and fall history in middle-aged and older adults: a multidimensional clinical analysis of nutritional status, bone health, and medication burden.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falling has become a significant factor in the mortality of elderly people. Little is known about whether sarcopenia can be a risk factor for falls in older adults. This study aims to assess the association between sarcopenia and falls among older Chinese according to the updated diagnostic guidelines of the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS 2019). We used data from the 2011 baseline and 2015 follow-up survey of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). This study examined the relationship between sarcopenia status and falls through cross-sectional analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were conducted to investigate the effect of sarcopenia status on subsequent falls, with the report of hazard ratio (HR). A total of 5,337 participants aged at least 60 years (51.3% men; mean age 67.6 ± 6.3) were enrolled in this analysis from the CHARLS 2011. The study revealed that the prevalence of falls was significantly higher in the possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia groups compared to the no sarcopenia group, with rates of 15.8%, 19.4%, and 24%, respectively. Logistic regression was utilized to investigate the association between sarcopenia and falls. Both possible sarcopenia (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.45) and sarcopenia (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.23-2.19) were positively associated with higher odds of falls (all p < 0.05). During the 4 years of follow-up, 1490 cases (29.9%) with incident falls were identified. In the longitudinal analysis, individuals with diagnosed sarcopenia (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.11-1.57) were more likely to have new-onset incident falls than their no-sarcopenia peers. Sarcopenia in the elderly is an independent risk factor for falls, with health screening and intervention reducing fall risk and improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.