ArticlePloS one2025
Injury alters sensory, motor, and integrative elements underlying operant conditioning in the medicinal leech.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From nociception in aneural animals to human suffering: toward a comparative biology of pain.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of pain/nociception often rely on simple reflexes to assess pain-related changes in behavior. However, there is considerable interest in utilizing more complex, self-initiated behaviors in place of stimulus-evoked reflexes. In this study we report an operant conditioning assay using Hirudo verbana (the medicinal leech) to assess the effects of injury on motivational and cognitive processes. Animals were placed in an arena consisting of an illuminated and a dark chamber with a connecting section in between. The connecting section was partially filled with gravel, which acted as an obstacle and delayed escape from the illuminated to the dark side. With repeated experience H. verbana learned to overcome the gravel obstacle, reflected as a decreased escape latency from the illuminated chamber. The capacity for this enhanced escape behavior was retained for up to two hours. In animals that received an injury to the posterior sucker, learning and memory of this operant escape task was disrupted. Injured animals also exhibited mechanosensory sensitization, changes in locomotion, changes in exploratory behavior, and increased negative phototaxis. Over 12 days, changes in locomotion, exploratory behavior, and phototaxis recovered to pre-injury levels, although mechanosensory sensitization remained. Disruptions in cognitive behavior also recovered during this period with the capacity for operant conditioning returning six days after injury and two hour retention of conditioning returning by day 12. This study shows that injury produces a complex and coordinated set of sensory, motor, and integrative changes in H. verbana that may be relevant to understanding the biological processes behind pain in vertebrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.