Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504814›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Titration-WB: A methodology for accurate quantitative protein determination overcoming reproducibility errors.

Alice Maestri, Ewa Ehrenborg, Olivera Werngren, Maria Olin, Carolina E Hagberg, Matteo Pedrelli, Paolo Parini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice MaestriDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-2289
Ewa EhrenborgDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olivera WerngrenDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria OlinCardio Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine Huddinge, and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carolina E HagbergDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matteo PedrelliCardio Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine Huddinge, and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Paolo PariniCardio Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine Huddinge, and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-8542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Western blotting (WB) is a cornerstone technique for protein detection and quantification in molecular biology. However, its semi-quantitative nature, reliance on housekeeping protein normalization, and susceptibility to technical variability often undermine data accuracy and reproducibility. To address these limitations, we introduce titration-based Western blotting (t-WB), as innovative quantitative approach that uses serial dilutions of protein samples to generate regression curves for precise protein quantification. The method mitigates common errors, including loading inaccuracies and signal saturation, by leveraging the R² value as a quality control metric and calculating the regression line. Its slope is then used as a measure of protein concentration, expressed as signal intensity/total protein loaded. The advantage of t-WB is the removal of housekeeping protein normalization, eliminating thus the bias created by experimental conditions that may alter housekeeping protein levels. t-WB was validated across diverse setups, demonstrating its robustness in minimizing inter-experiment variability and improving accuracy by normalizing to a single internal control. By standardizing workflows, t-WB ensures reproducibility, uncovers subtle biological changes, and resolves biases inherent to classical WB protocols.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternProteinsAnimalsHumansReproducibility of ResultsProteins

Identifiers

PMID40504814
PMCPMC12161570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.