ArticlePloS one2025
ML-ROM wall shear stress prediction in patient-specific vascular pathologies under a limited clinical training data regime.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-fidelity numerical simulations such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) have been proven effective in analysing haemodynamics, offering insight into many vascular conditions. However, these methods often face challenges of high computational cost and long processing times. Data-driven approaches such as Reduced Order Modeling (ROM) and Machine Learning (ML) are increasingly being explored alongside CFD to advance biomechanical research and application. This study presents an integration of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD)-based ROM with neural network-based ML models to predict Wall Shear Stress (WSS) in patient-specific vascular pathologies. CFD was used to generate WSS data, followed by POD to construct the ROM. The ML models were trained to predict the ROM coefficients from the inlet flowrate waveform, which can be routinely collected in the clinic. Two ML models were explored: a simpler flowrate-coefficients mapping model and a more advanced autoregressive model. Both models were tested against two case studies: flow in Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) and flow in Aortic Dissection (AD). Despite the limited training data sets (three flowrate waveforms for the PAD case and two for the AD case), the models were able to predict the haemodynamic indices, with the flowrate-coefficients mapping model outperforming the autoregressive model in both case studies. The accuracy is higher in the PAD case study, with reduced accuracy in the more complex case study of AD. Additionally, the computational cost analysis reveals a significant reduction in computational demands, with speed-up ratios in the order of 104 for both case studies. This approach shows an effective integration of ROM and ML techniques for fast and reliable evaluations of haemodynamic properties that contribute to vascular conditions, setting the stage for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.