ArticlePloS one2025
Screening and validation of key microRNAs regulating muscle development in Hanper sheep.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and bioinformatic functional analysis of novel and known polymorphisms in the myostatin gene of Ukrainian Carpathian Mountain sheep.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- miRNA sequencing reveals hypothalamic microRNAs associated with seasonal reproduction in Sunite sheep.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesIn sheep farming, the economic significance of meat characteristics is substantial, and advancing the genetic quality of livestock relies heavily on understanding the cellular mechanisms behind muscle growth and its regulation. This study examined miRNA expression patterns in the longissimus dorsi muscle tissue of Hanper sheep of various ages, with the goal of determining their biological functions and identifying miRNAs and their target mRNAs that influence muscle development and meat quality.
methodsUsing the Image-Pro Plus 6.0 program and HE and fluorescent staining procedures, we measured the diameter of muscle fibers in the longissimus dorsi of Hanper sheep at three distinct ages (1, 7, and 13 months) in order to calculate the average fiber size. For the analysis of muscle fiber area, one-way Analysis of Variance was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 25.0, with Least Significant Difference tests applied afterward to compare the different groups. Transcriptome sequencing was conducted to identify miRNAs, and bioinformatics tools were applied to predict their target genes. GO and KEGG functional annotations were used to analyze the biological functions of these target genes. RT-qPCR was performed to validate the expression levels of differential expressed miRNAs.
resultsMuscle fiber diameter and area increased progressively with age, as indicated by HE and fluorescence staining. Four novel miRNAs identified for the first time in sheep were among the 116 differential expressed miRNAs that were found. These miRNAs were found to be involved in key pathways such as TGF-β, mTOR, Wnt, and MAPK, which regulate muscle growth and development. It was determined that three new miRNA-mRNA pairs included oar-miR-133/MSC, oar-miR-148a/FST, and oar-miR-410-3p/NIN may be essential for muscle growth. RT-qPCR results confirmed the expression trends observed in the transcriptome sequencing data.
conclusionsOur knowledge of the fundamental molecular mechanisms underpinning muscle growth and development is improved by the discovery of new miRNAs and the target genes that correspond to them. These findings may serve as new breeding targets for improving meat quality in sheep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.