Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504603›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science2025

Spicy or Not? Exploring Kimchi's Spiciness Perception Across Spicy Food Tolerant and Sensitive Groups.

Seo-Yeong Chon, Mina K Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seo-Yeong ChonDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition and K-Food Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Republic of Korea.
Mina K KimDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition and K-Food Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-453X

Funding

Jeonbuk National University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the perception of spiciness in kimchi among individuals classified as either the spicy food-tolerant group (ST) or the spicy food-sensitive group (SS). Four types of commercially available kimchi with varying levels of capsaicin content were analyzed. Participants were segmented into the ST and SS groups using hierarchical cluster analysis based on their spiciness perception of ramen samples with different capsaicin intensities. Sensory evaluations of kimchi included assessments of appearance, color, crispness, spiciness, saltiness, and umami using a nine-point hedonic scale and a five-point just-about-right (JAR) scale. Notably, spiciness exhibited significant differences in both liking and JAR ratings (p < 0.001). A direct comparison of spiciness liking for K4 showed that SS participants had significantly lower preference compared to ST participants. Open-ended responses revealed that 34.1% of ST participants found K4's spiciness "just about right," whereas 83% of SS participants found it too strong. The ST group exhibited higher spiciness tolerance and preference, particularly for strongly spiced kimchi, whereas the SS group preferred milder kimchi and rated the spiciest samples poorly. These findings underscore the importance of individual and cultural factors in sensory evaluation and provide insights for developing kimchi products tailored to diverse consumer preferences. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The findings of this study reveal that individual differences in spiciness perception and tolerance significantly influence kimchi preferences. This information can guide the development of customized kimchi products catering to varying consumer needs and global markets, thereby enhancing product acceptance and marketability.

Indexed as

BrassicaFermented FoodsFood PreferencesSpicesTaste PerceptionAdolescentAdultCapsaicinConsumer BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTasteYoung AdultCapsaicin

Identifiers

PMID40504603
PMCPMC12161441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.