ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Home Monitoring in Interstitial Lung Disease: Protocol for a Real-World Observational Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remote patient monitoring in autoimmune related interstitial lung diseases: a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterstitial lung diseases (ILDs), a group of parenchymal lung disorders, present with varying degrees of inflammation and fibrosis, which lead to symptoms such as progressive breathlessness, impaired quality of life (QoL), and reduced life expectancy. Patients with ILD can experience a sudden worsening of their condition, known as an acute exacerbation, which is associated with inappropriate hospital admissions, concomitant National Health Service (NHS) costs, impaired QoL, and high mortality. The heterogeneity of ILDs, the unpredictability of acute exacerbations, and significant variation in disease progression and response to treatment present numerous management challenges. Standard care typically involves 3-6 monthly hospital outpatient visits to monitor disease and assess response to treatment. Home monitoring with remote review of spirometry, pulse oximetry, and patient-reported measures offers an alternative approach to in-person clinic review and laboratory-based physiological measurements. Clinical trials indicate home monitoring of patients with ILD is acceptable, and results correlate with laboratory-based pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The impact of implementing home monitoring for patients with ILD in a real-world setting is not well understood.
objectiveWe aim to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and acceptability of home monitoring with standard care in the management of patients with ILD.
methodsThis study has been registered as a quality improvement project at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (reference 13660) and Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (reference 24-1378). The project has been co-designed by the steering group, including clinicians, researchers, technology partners, a patient advocacy charity, and patients diagnosed with ILD. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be provided a handheld spirometer, pulse oximeter, and access to patientMpower, an electronic health app, on their smart devices and followed up for 12 months. All participants will be asked to complete at least once weekly home spirometry and pulse oximetry measurements and 3 monthly patient-reported measures, including outcome, engagement, and experience measures, using the patientMpower app. Results will be available to the clinicians in real time and used to monitor disease progression, symptoms, and QoL, and to assess treatment response.
resultsThis study was funded by NHS Digital in September 2021. Patient recruitment and data collection started in March 2022. By January 2024, 186 patients were enrolled. All patients will have home monitoring for at least 12 months. Results are expected to be published at the end of 2025.
conclusionsWe hypothesize home monitoring will be safe, effective and acceptable for patients with ILD and result in a 50% reduction in routine laboratory-based pulmonary function tests and in-person clinic consultations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/65339.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.