Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504527›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Clinical Trial Discussion and Participation in a Breast Cancer Cohort by Race and Ethnicity.

Nan Chen, Jincong Q Freeman, Fangyuan Zhao, Leah Goldberg, Sudha R Yarlagadda, Elizabeth Terman, Dezheng Huo, Rita Nanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nan ChenSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jincong Q FreemanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Fangyuan ZhaoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Leah GoldbergDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Sudha R YarlagaddaSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Elizabeth TermanDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Dezheng HuoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Rita NandaSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

SPECIALIZED TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE DEMOGRAPHY &ECON.T32AG000243 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DAVID O MELTZER · 1994 to 2026
$8.2M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer clinical trial participation pose a significant barrier to providing equitable care. Black and Hispanic patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, and an improved understanding of barriers to enrollment is needed. Objective: To examine patterns of clinical trial discussion and participation and patient attitudes toward clinical trial participation in a diverse cohort of patients with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used survey data from patients enrolled in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort. Patients were queried about clinical trial discussion and subsequent enrollment in a therapeutic clinical trial. Barriers to trial enrollment were also assessed. Surveys were conducted from July to September 2022, and data were analyzed from February to October 2024. Exposure: Self-reported race and ethnicity, including Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were discussing participation in a breast cancer clinical trial with a health care practitioner, participating in a clinical trial, and barriers to trial enrollment. Results: Of 1150 respondents (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [11.9] years), 51 (4.4%) were Asian, 224 (19.5%) were Black, 35 (3.1%) were Hispanic, and 838 (73.0%) were White. A total of 447 respondents (38.9%) reported discussing trial participation with a health care practitioner. There were no differences in trial discussion between White patients and other racial groups (Asian: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.31-1.82; Black: AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.21; Hispanic: AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.26-2.08). Among 443 patients offered a trial, 285 (64.3%) participated. While there were differences in trial participation across racial and ethnic groups, these differences were not significant after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Among 158 patients who did not enroll in the trial offered, 37 (23.4%) reported ineligibility, 17 (10.8%) were worried about the possibility of getting a placebo, 16 (10.1%) were worried about extra time required, and 14 (8.9%) were worried about possible adverse effects. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study demonstrated that when offered, patients across racial and ethnic groups were equally likely to participate in clinical trials. In addition to ineligibility, time toxicity was a significant barrier to enrollment. These data provide valuable insights that can serve as a roadmap for how to expand access to trials for all patients, regardless of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic background.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicEthnicityPatient ParticipationRacial GroupsAdultAgedAsianBlack or African AmericanChicagoCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40504527
PMCPMC12163658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.