Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504519›Full record

ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2025

That Stinging Sensation: Modularity and the Origin of the Stinging Cell.

Leslie S Babonis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leslie S BabonisDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Funding

Gene Regulation and the Origin of New Cell TypesR35GM147253 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Leslie S Babonis · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Cornell UniversityNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147253NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM147253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All cells arise through division of other cells; thus, cells with new functions (novel cell types) must evolve from ancestral cells with a different function. How, then, do novel cell types arise? Each cell is a composite of many functions that, together, confer a cell's phenotype. A single cell might have both the capacity to sense the environment and to secrete a specialized product. Allowing those two phenotypic modules to vary independently enables the diversification of groups of cells that either secrete the same product in response to diverse environmental cues or that secrete different products in response to the same cue. In this review, I summarize the shared and unique phenotypic modules that define two types of secretory cells in cnidarians (corals, jellyfish, and their kin): mechanosensory neurons and cnidocytes (stinging cells). I then propose a series of discrete changes that could have driven the origin of a cnidocyte from an ancestral cell that looked much like a modern mechanosensory neuron. I argue that modeling cell type diversification in this way-by gain, loss, and modification of existing phenotype modules-is useful for interpreting patterns of shared gene expression across related cell types and for predicting how new cell types could arise.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCnidariaAnimalsMechanoreceptorsPhenotypeSensation

Identifiers

PMID40504519
PMCPMC12464826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.