ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2025
That Stinging Sensation: Modularity and the Origin of the Stinging Cell.
Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel cell and tissue dynamics drive the unusual biology of the catch tentacle, an inducible organ of aggression found in the sea anemonebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Morphological and functional characterization of the ptychocyte, a stingless stinging cell.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spatially resolved gene expression analysis illuminates location-specific functions in the reef-building coral Pocillopora acuta.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
All cells arise through division of other cells; thus, cells with new functions (novel cell types) must evolve from ancestral cells with a different function. How, then, do novel cell types arise? Each cell is a composite of many functions that, together, confer a cell's phenotype. A single cell might have both the capacity to sense the environment and to secrete a specialized product. Allowing those two phenotypic modules to vary independently enables the diversification of groups of cells that either secrete the same product in response to diverse environmental cues or that secrete different products in response to the same cue. In this review, I summarize the shared and unique phenotypic modules that define two types of secretory cells in cnidarians (corals, jellyfish, and their kin): mechanosensory neurons and cnidocytes (stinging cells). I then propose a series of discrete changes that could have driven the origin of a cnidocyte from an ancestral cell that looked much like a modern mechanosensory neuron. I argue that modeling cell type diversification in this way-by gain, loss, and modification of existing phenotype modules-is useful for interpreting patterns of shared gene expression across related cell types and for predicting how new cell types could arise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.