Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504427›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2025

Olfactory variation among closely related cactophilic Drosophila species.

Amber Crowley-Gall, John E Layne, Byrappa Ammagarahalli, Aaron A Hamrick, Lucinda P Lawson, Stephanie M Rollmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Receptor sequence divergence, gain, loss, duplication, and neofunctionalization drive olfactory adaptation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Genomic plasticity drives olfactory adaptation in a pest fly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amber Crowley-GallDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
John E LayneDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
Byrappa AmmagarahalliDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
Aaron A HamrickDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
Lucinda P LawsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
Stephanie M RollmannDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA. stephanie.rollmann@uc.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS-1456932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemosensation plays an important role in a wide range of behaviors including host identification and localization, oviposition site selection, and mate recognition. Variation in the ability to detect chemical signals may influence behavior in animals like insects that use volatile cues emitted from plants when discriminating between potential hosts. Differences in odor detection has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in driving changes in host use within and between insect species, leading to reproductive isolation between populations and eventual speciation through specialized host adaptation. We examined between-species variation in odor tuning and asked whether it is linked to shifts in host plant use in the Drosophila repleta species group, a taxonomic radiation of flies specializing on cacti that exhibits multiple shifts in host plant use across their phylogeny resulting in three current states: (1) Opuntia cactus specialists, (2) columnar cactus specialists, and (3) cactus "generalists" which use both hosts. We measured odor response profiles from select olfactory sensillar subtypes across multiple species within the group as well as for the outgroup D. melanogaster. Variation in both sensitivity and specificity to odors was observed, with some olfactory sensory neurons exhibiting differences associated with host cactus use. This study is the first in-depth analysis of the olfactory system across the repleta species group and provides the opportunity to test for conserved mechanisms in the olfactory system underlying divergence and host shift.

Indexed as

DrosophilaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSmellAnimalsCactaceaeFemaleOdorantsOpuntiaPhylogenySensillaSpecies SpecificityEvolutionHost plantOlfactionOlfactory sensory neuron

Identifiers

PMID40504427
PMCPMC12321934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.