ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
The Epididymis: An Ultrasound Primer-What the Radiologist Needs to Know.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epididymis, a crucial component of the male reproductive system, plays a pivotal role in sperm maturation, transport, and storage. It can be affected by a diverse spectrum of pathologies, including congenital anomalies, infectious and inflammatory diseases, cystic and neoplastic lesions, and traumatic injuries. These conditions can present with overlapping clinical symptoms such as scrotal pain, swelling or infertility, making imaging essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for evaluating epididymal abnormalities due to its high resolution, real-time capabilities, and lack of ionizing radiation. Doppler ultrasound enhances diagnostic precision by assessing vascularity, particularly in inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging provides superior soft tissue contrast and is useful for characterizing complex or indeterminate lesions, while computed tomography is primarily reserved for staging malignancies or evaluating severe trauma. This pictorial review aims to provide an overview of epididymal pathologies by correlating clinical presentation with multimodal imaging findings, predominantly with the use of ultrasound. Emphasis is placed on characteristic imaging features that facilitate differentiation between benign and malignant conditions, guiding radiologists in forming accurate differential diagnoses. By illustrating key pathologic entities, this review seeks to enhance diagnostic confidence and improve clinical decision-making in the assessment of epididymal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40504391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.