ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Reflections on implementing population-based measures for the prevention of non-communicable diseases].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn view of the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the focus is shifting increasingly towards structural prevention measures. Effective implementation of these measures is crucial. Using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework, this article reflects on the implementation of two ratio prevention measures and discusses challenges in the application of implementation science approaches.
methodsCase 1 (Collaboration for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Public Health in Africa-CEBHA+) examined measures for the prevention of NCDs and road traffic accidents in sub-Saharan Africa. Case 2 ("Präventionskette Freiham") evaluated a community network in Germany that aims to enable children and adolescents from socially disadvantaged families to grow up well and healthy. Data published in project-related publications served as the basis for the analysis, supplemented by a questionnaire-based reflection by the researchers involved. For both data sources, the data collected were coded inductively and assigned to the deductive categories of the CICI Framework.
resultsIn both cases, contextual and structural conditions, implementation agents, and strategies were assessed on multiple levels, with an emphasis on implementation agents. While Präventionskette Freiham pursued a systematic process evaluation with explicit use of implementation science approaches, this was only implicitly considered in CEBHA+, which makes comparability, classification in the literature, and overarching consideration more difficult. DISCUSSION: Implementation science approaches should be given a stronger focus in the field of relationship prevention in order to fully exploit their potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40504363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.