ArticleCNS drugs2025
The Effects of Cenobamate and Its Dosage on Cognition: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in 84 Individuals with Epilepsy.
Article in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive Effects of Cenobamate as Compared to Perampanel: A Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study in 600 Patients.CNS drugs · 2026Article
- Cognitive Side Effects of Antiseizure Medications in Adults with Epilepsy: An Update with a Focus on New Therapeutic Agents.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Cenobamate Improves Emotional Dysregulation, Impulsivity, and Apathy in Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Longitudinal Neuropsychological Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Long-Term Impact of Cenobamate on Cognition, Adaptive Behavior, and Quality of Life in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Long-term Impact of Cenobamate on Cognition in Patients with Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: Outcomes from an Exploratory Real-World Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies on cenobamate (CNB) have generally reported neutral to positive effects on objective cognitive performance in patients with epilepsy, but are limited to dosages up to 250 mg/day. However, a case report (Witt et al. in Neurocase 30:91-96, 2024) noted severe memory deterioration at 400 mg/day.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine dose-dependent effects of CNB on cognition.
methodsIn this retrospective longitudinal real-world study, executive functions and episodic memory were assessed in adult patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy during CNB therapy and compared with baseline. Subgroups were stratified by daily CNB doses of ≥ 300 mg versus < 300 mg. Executive functions were assessed using the EpiTrack
resultsThe study included 84 patients, 24 (28.6%) of them with a CNB dose of ≥ 300 mg. With a mean CNB dose of 200.6 ± 114.3 mg (range 12.5-400.0 mg), seizure freedom was achieved in 11.9% with no significant difference between the lower and the higher dose group. Repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed a significant decline in executive functions at ≥ 300 mg (n = 84; F = 6.35, p = 0.014) compared to baseline. Changes were correlated with CNB dose (r = - 0.31, p = 0.004). Individual level analyses indicated that 50.0% of patients on higher versus 16.7% on lower CNB doses deteriorated according to reliable change indices (RCI). In a subgroup undergoing extensive memory testing, verbal retention showed a significant negative, dose-independent effect at the group level (n = 22; F = 7.95, p = 0.011), with intraindividual declines in 28.6% (≥ 300 mg) versus 13.3% (< 300 mg). Other memory parameters were unaffected.
conclusionsThe results of this real-world study investigating objective cognitive performance under CNB suggest possible, partially dose-dependent negative effects of CNB on cognition. Daily CNB doses of ≥ 300 mg were associated with a significant decline in executive functions. Furthermore, a dose-independent negative effect on verbal retention was observed in a subgroup of patients undergoing extensive memory assessment. Given the limitations of retrospective audits, our findings prompt further, larger scope studies to confirm the results. However, a careful balance between seizure control at the lowest CNB dose possible and potential cognitive side effects appears advisable, which requires the implementation of cognitive monitoring in standard care where possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.