Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504358›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025

Emerging Trends in Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology.

Saahil Chadha, Durga V Sritharan, Thomas Hager, Rahul D'Souza, Sanjay Aneja

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saahil ChadhaDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8519-7895
Durga V SritharanDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6553-209X
Thomas HagerDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Rahul D'SouzaDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Sanjay AnejaDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA. sanjay.aneja@yale.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-7528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis article explores the evolving role of artificial intelligence (AI) in neuro-oncology, highlighting its potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, predict patient outcomes, optimize treatment planning, and streamline clinical workflows. RECENT

findingsAI applications have led to significant advancements in automated tumor segmentation, molecular classification, risk stratification, treatment response evaluation, and computational pathology. AI-driven innovations have also accelerated drug discovery and leveraged natural language processing to generate structured clinical reports and extract actionable insights from unstructured data. AI has transformative potential in neuro-oncology; however, challenges like data quality, model generalizability, and clinical integration persist. Overcoming these barriers may involve new computational techniques and hardware efficiencies, as well as raising awareness, fostering interdisciplinary education, and expanding access to AI-driven tools.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrain NeoplasmsMedical OncologyHumansArtificial intelligenceBrain metastasisComputational pathologyDeep learningGliomaNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID40504358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.